It goes without saying, the subject of assigning numbers to human beings is far from popular. Thoughts of global control and conspiracy cloud the thoughts of many. The current practicality of every human being inscribed with a number on their arm at birth is nil. Even at the country level, no one would put up with it. Alternatively, scientists and doctors have proposed the insertion of identification chips underneath the skin. The electronic chips would store a unique number. The only problem is that by the time the electronic chips were delivered to the hospital, the technology would soon be close to end of life. Even so, cloning the chip would render the system useless.
Why are systems like these being proposed? The list is certainly huge. For many, health care and insurance come to mind. For others, personal credit, law enforcement, and national security come to mind. For whatever the reason, good or bad, classifying humans with numbers is a debated topic.
On a simple scale, the department of public safety manages a database of driver's licenses and the social security administration manages a database of social security numbers. These systems work well for their intended purpose. However; they too are approaching end of life in terms of technology.
|Copyright Grateful Dead|
Most people would agree that their identity is important to them. Your identity is tied to your bank account and your credit history is tied to your identity. Equally so, your identity is who you are. It is the places that you have been in life. It is the moments that you spent with loved ones and it is the photographs that you took on your favorite vacations. Your identity is comprised of some many things that make you unique. It is the aisle that you walk down when you buy groceries and it is the way that you sip your coffee in the morning. It is the exact time that you call your family members to tell them that you love them and it is those childhood memories that you will never forget. It is also the exact amount of money in your bank account at this moment in time and it is every payment that you have ever made to every creditor in your credit history file. Your eye color, your hair color, your skin color, the length of your hair, the shape of your face, and the way you walk when you just finished working out help form your identity. Your DNA can be uniquely associated to your identity. And most importantly, your memory (or your memories) in your brain form your identity. Without memories, we would not know what our identity was. The memories in our brain are more important than our DNA. DNA can be replicated. The human brain cannot (yet).
If some or all of this information is copied without the knowledge of the
person it is copied from, then the person that it is copied to is "green".
So if someone were to take all of this information from you, who would you be? Perhaps it sounds completely crazy that someone could actually take all or part of this stuff from you. In actuality, just a small fraction of this information can reek havoc if stolen. In today's time, this information can be stolen in microseconds from the other side of the world. During World War II, this could not happen anywhere near the scale of where it can happen today.
Most of the characteristics described above form a loose connection to the individual. There is no intrinsic association between a person and a subset of DNA base pairs that describe that person's genetic traits. Equally so, there is not an intrinsic association between a person and that person's bank account. Alice can trade social security cards with Eve and the system begins to break down. In contrast, there is an intrinsic association between a person and his or her brain. We have not yet figured out how to transplant memories or subsections of the brain between different humans.
For the past several years, several efforts have been underway to build a system that will keep us safe and help protect our financial credit history.
Systems such as these are concerned with identification and authentication. Validating that someone is who they say they are is critical for three reasons: individual security, national security, and global security.
Neither asymmetric or symmetric cryptography solve the authentication problem.